do we really still need a "native stablecoin"?
the bridged USDC via @OneSecBridge is just called "USDC"
on the other hand, both circle and tether will stop native integration; instead they are both introducing their bridges (which would still come w ridiculous integration price ask):
the tether bridge is powered by layerzero, and the new USDT is called "USDT0"; circle is going to do the same (sth not called "USDC")
and they will not support on marketing, adoption, exchange integration, ... other than maybe 1 post as announcement
instead of paying for a non-native-anymore 'native stablecoin', why not using the money for binance/coincase integration - so exchange users can send their USDC/USDT directly to an ICP wallet
3.53K
14
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.